Minutes January 2005
C: SYSTEM PROTECTION SUBCOMMITTEE
Chair: T. Seegers
Vice Chair: R. Hunt
The System
Protection Subcommittee met on January 12th, 2005 at 3:45 PM in San Diego,
CA. 40 people attended the
meeting, including 21 members.
8
WGs met at this meeting. Working Group C4 changed names to “Industry Experience
with System Integrity Protection Schemes” to more accurately reflect the WG
assignment. Working Group C7, Guidelines for Protection System Testing
disbanded. Working C11 Guide for Protection System Testing started to produce
an IEEE Guide, and will submit a PAR after the May meeting. The Peformance of
Relaying during Stressed Conditions was renamed to C12 to resolve a conflict with the existing
C8 Phasor Models working group. Task Force TF13 Guide for Undervoltage Load
Shedding will meet at the May meeting, with Alex Apostolov appointed as chair
and Shinichi Imai as vice-chair.
Jeff Pond has been accepted
as a member of the C System Protection Subcommittee.
WG Reports:
C1: Cyber Security Issues for Relaying
The C1 working group met in 2
joint sessions with the PSSC Working Group C1. A total of 8 existing members
plus 5 new members and 26 guests attended.
Herbert Faulk gave an update
on IEC work on cyber security.
There was much discussion on
security vulnerabilities and the need for security measures.
Work was done to refine the
outline and some writing assignments were made. Assignments are due by March
15.
Draft 1 of the paper will be
sent out.
C2: Power
Quality Issues in Protective Devices
C2 did not meet in San Diego.
C3: Processes, Issues, Trends and Quality
Control of Relay Settings
Working Group C3 met Tuesday, January 11, 2005 in San
Diego, CA in a single session with 13 members and 10 guests participating.
All initial writing assignments for the body of the
report have been submitted. Discussion
and comments during the meeting included:
·
Section 3.3: The specific issue of configuration
management and change control will be clarified (Arif Cubucku).
·
Section
4.2.2: Verifying the system model (Alex
Apostolov), WECC requirements for verifying the system model (Jon Sykes)
·
Section 4.3:
o
The use of tools
to simplify the relay setting process (e.g., autocalculation of taps in bank
diffs, relay setting rules in short circuit/relay database programs), with
suggestions to vendors (Alex Apostolov)
o
Any legal
requirements for retaining superseded relay settings/calculations (Art Buanno)?
o
Any BC Hydro
guidelines for retaining superseded relay settings/calculations (Frank
Plumptre)?
·
Section 4.6:
o
The use of
computer-aided checking of relay settings (Gary Kobet)
o
Review/addition
of detail to this section (Ron Beazer)
·
Section 9.0: Utility engineers to provide input to this
section (Greg Sessler, Stan Klein, Jim O’Brien, and George Gresko to work with
Solveig Ward)
·
Sections 1.0
Introduction, 2.0 Definitions, and 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations will be
developed (Steve Kunsman and Gary Kobet)
The deadline for these revisions is February 15. A revised draft will be sent to the group by
March 1, for review and comments to be discussed at the May meeting.
The next stage of work will include refining the
sections to fit the scope and create a coherent document and eliminate
redundancy. An editorial team made up of
Ken Birt, Steven Kell, and Gary Kobet will review the March document toward
this effort.
The WG requests that the revised draft be posted to
the PSRC website by March 8. Gary Kobet
will send this draft to Rich Hunt, vice-chair of C-SC by March 1.
To review, output of the working group will be a PSRC
report, with an associated Transactions paper summarizing the report. Target date for completion is 2006.
C4: Industry
Experiences With Power System Protection Schemes (PSPS)
WG
C-4 met in double sessions with 15 members and 15 guests
The
Working Group volunteers presented writing assignments and discussed:
·
The outline of
the topics to be raised in the questionnaire
·
A liaison
structure for the Working Group, intended to facilitate personal contacts as
questioner gets on the way to be submitted and thought the response process
·
Importance of
coordination with the manufacturers for tapping on their knowledge of
geographic resources in part of the worlds we may have less contacts with
·
A template of a
procedure for acceptance and archiving of the information on RAS submitted to
(Main) Mid American Area Reliability Council regional councils; he also
presented the list of criteria to review installations.
·
The need for the
questionnaire to cover technology related implementation issues (use of PMUs,
protocols, time synchronization techniques, etc.) which were not addressed in
the previous IEEE/CIGRE survey
Stan
Horowitz proposed the name change of the WG which would better reflect its
mission. It was unanimously accepted
(new name is "Industry Experience with System Integrity Protection
Schemes").
Jaime
Delaree, explained that the software tool in possession of the PSRC is dated
1997 and there may be some incompatibles with many of the personal computers
that would be used for responding to the survey. The members discussed the possibility for
some large organizations (vendors, IEEE itself, universities) which may already
possess a web-based software. The SC
Chair (Tony Seegers) volunteered to look into the appropriate mechanism for the
most efficient way for respondent to fill out the survey.
Second
Session:
·
Presentation by
Mr. Shinichi Imai, on TEPCO's practice of voltage and reactive power
management, which was followed by a number of questions. Among other things, Mr. Imai proposed
creation of the new WG on under-voltage load shedding.
After
each session and the presentation, members discussed the next steps and members
with new assignments. Writing
assignments received will be distributed electronically to the members before
the May 2005 meeting
C5: Deployment and use of Disturbance
Recorders
The Working Group met on
Wednesday, January 12, 2005 with 8 members and 6 guests present. Richard Young
joined the working group.
Vice Chairman Tony Napikoski
has requested to be a corresponding member of the working group due to budget
restrictions within his organization. Jeff Pond will fill this position.
A copy of Draft 9 of the
report was distributed on CD. Outstanding writing assignments were reviewed.
Several were received. The report needs to be edited. Tony Guiliante, Harish Mehta, Bruce Pickett,
and Richard Young have agreed to provide an editorial review of this draft and
send their comments to the chairman by March 1. Our goal is to have two review
cycles prior to the next meeting.
Jim Ingleson has posted draft
9, both as a Word document and a zipped file, on the website for all who are
interested. The web address is http://www.pes-psrc.org/c/CWG5.html
C6: Relay
Engineering in Power Engineering Curricula
The Working Group C-6 met
with 10 members and 2 guests present. The meeting was conducted by J. De La
Ree, W-G Vice-Chair. The minutes and attendance list of the previous meeting
held in Portland, were distributed and accepted. Further discussions on the
course outline and content were the subject of the meeting. Initial contribution by several WG members
were presented and discussed. Following
our initial proposal, contributions will be submitted by April 15 to form the
first Draft of the paper. Later effort will include the development of modules
for a senior level protection course.
C7: Guide
for Protection System Testing
WG C-7 Met on January 12 in single session with total
20 (9 M, 11 G) in attendance.
The WG members reviewed the latest working copy of the
WG member’s contributions
·
The CIGRE WG
34-04, January 1986, Evaluations of characteristics and performance of power
system protection relay and protective systems, report for other types of
protection and protective devices will be reviewed as it pertains to system
testing with focus on system testing
·
Typical test
setup arrangements and equipment requirements for end-to-end testing and agreed
to combine contributions from different members
·
Discussed system
testing and the value of standard library – To help manufacturers test their
respective devices in the same way, and for users to have a confidence level to
the products. The WG members agreed to
include a recommendation. Other WG may
need to be created for developing the details
·
Draft of the
proposed PAR in preparation of the recommendation to the Subcommittee guide to
officially begin in May 2005
Since the results of the WG points to the need for a
guide, it is recommended that the WG be disbanded and a new WG be established
with a new assignment to prepare a Guide.
The recommended assignment is:
Assignment:
The Working Group will develop a guide for Power
System Protection Testing. The Guide
will include System Application Test Requirements, Scope and level of tests and
Benefits of system testing for Overall Protective Schemes. This assignment encompasses overall system
testing procedures (generators, line, transformer, capacitors, SPSs, end-to-end
testing, distributed application within substation, etc.), data collection
requirements, as well as the test procedure definitions. The WG will describe the methods, extent, and
types of system tests for protection at various voltage levels and
applications. Includes control functions
which are inherent to the protective system, Security vs. Dependability (Out of
step). Importance of line testing,
testing various phases, indirect trip time, closed loop tests (dynamic /
non-linear tests).
C8: Phasor-Based
Models for Analyzing Relay Performance
The working group did not meet in San
Diego. The working group is awaiting feedback from the IEEE on the editorial
review of the paper.
C9: Under
Frequency Load Shedding and Restoration
The
working group met on Tuesday, January 11th, with 13 members and 10 guests
present. The latest draft has been reviewed by the working group editors. The
draft document will be sent to the IEEE Editor for pre-ballot review by
February 15th, and we will request that a balloting body be formed, in
anticipation of balloting later this year. A PAR extension was requested and
approved.
The
working group discussed writing a paper to present at a technical conference.
Five working group members (Alex Apostolov, Rich Young, Vahid Madani, Pratap
Mysore, and Mukesh Nagpal) volunteered to write the paper and prepare an
associated presentation.
Tony
Seegers, Subcommittee Chairman, suggested that work on the paper wait until the
balloting process has taken place to determine if any changes will be required
to the guide before the paper is prepared.
C11: Guide
for Protection System Testing
It was decided at the meeting in San Diego to disband Working Group C7, and start a new Working Group C11, with the goal of creating an IEEE Guide. The new WG C11 will hold a first meeting at the May PSRC meeting. A possible assignment was discussed, as follows.
Assignment:
The Working Group will develop a guide for Power
System Protection Testing. The Guide
will include System Application Test Requirements, Scope and level of tests and
Benefits of system testing for Overall Protective Schemes. This assignment encompasses overall system
testing procedures (generators, line, transformer, capacitors, SPSs, end-to-end
testing, distributed application within substation, etc.), data collection
requirements, as well as the test procedure definitions. The WG will describe the methods, extent, and
types of system tests for protection at various voltage levels and
applications. Includes control functions
which are inherent to the protective system, Security vs. Dependability (Out of
step). Importance of line testing,
testing various phases, indirect trip time, closed loop tests (dynamic /
non-linear tests).
C12: Performance
of Relaying During Stressed Conditions
The WG met with impressive
attendance of 17 members and 32 guests. The WG reviewed and updated the
assignment:
Create a working group report
and a summary IEEE paper that will describe performance of protective relays
during stressed power system conditions. The work will not cover Special Protection
Systems or Remedial Action Schemes.
Importance
of Cooperation and sharing of information with the NERC System Protection &
Control Task Force has been emphasized.
Tom Wiedman and Bill Kennedy will present results of the TF work at the
May PSRC meeting. To further strengthen the cooperation, Hassan Shah will be
liaison with the TF.
The
WG reviewed and updated the scope. The outline of the report was created and a
number of members volunteered to contribute by April 15, 2005. The plan for
completion is January 2008.
CTF13: Task For on Undervoltage Load Shed
A new task force CTF13 Task
Force on Undervoltage Load Shed will meet at the May meeting, with Alex
Apostolov as Chair of the task force, and Shinichi Imai as Vice-Chair. The task
force will explore the possibility of writing a paper, or creating an IEEE
Guide, on undervoltage load shed applications.
Power System Analysis,
Computing & Economics Committee Liaison by Malcolm Swanson
No activities to report
NERC by Phil Winston
No activities to report
Liaison Report of the
IEEE PES Power System Stability Controls SC to the PSRC by Gary Michel
No activities to report